Implement API Gateway Pattern
Status
Accepted
Context
With our microservices architecture (ADR-0003: Adopt Microservices Architecture), we now have multiple services that need to be accessed by various client applications (web, mobile, admin portal). Without a unified entry point, we face several challenges:
Current Client-Service Communication Issues:
- Clients need to know about and connect to multiple service endpoints
- Cross-cutting concerns (authentication, rate limiting, logging) duplicated across services
- Different protocols and data formats across services create client complexity
- CORS configuration needed on every service for browser clients
- No centralized point for API versioning and documentation
- Difficult to implement security policies consistently
- Load balancing and failover logic scattered across clients
Requirements:
- Single entry point for all external API access
- Centralized authentication and authorization
- Rate limiting and throttling capabilities
- Request/response transformation and protocol translation
- Load balancing and service discovery integration
- Comprehensive logging and monitoring
- API versioning and backward compatibility support
We evaluated three approaches:
- No Gateway: Clients communicate directly with services
- API Gateway: Single entry point routing to backend services
- Backend for Frontend (BFF): Separate gateways per client type
Decision
We will implement an API Gateway pattern using Kong as our gateway technology, providing a single entry point for all client-to-service communication.
API Gateway Architecture
Gateway Responsibilities
Routing & Load Balancing:
- Route requests to appropriate backend services
- Load balance requests across service instances
- Health checking and automatic failover
- Service discovery integration
Security:
- JWT token validation and user authentication
- API key management for different client types
- Rate limiting per user/API key/IP address
- CORS policy enforcement
- Request/response sanitization
Protocol & Data Transformation:
- HTTP to HTTP/gRPC protocol bridging
- Request/response data format transformation
- API versioning support (v1, v2 routing)
- Legacy API compatibility layers
Observability:
- Centralized access logging
- Request/response metrics collection
- Distributed tracing correlation
- Error rate and latency monitoring
Routing Configuration
| Route Pattern | Target Service | Authentication | Rate Limit |
|---|---|---|---|
/api/v1/auth/* |
User Service | None | 100/min |
/api/v1/users/* |
User Service | Required | 1000/min |
/api/v1/products/* |
Catalog Service | Optional | 2000/min |
/api/v1/inventory/* |
Inventory Service | Required | 500/min |
/api/v1/cart/* |
Cart Service | Required | 1000/min |
/api/v1/orders/* |
Order Service | Required | 200/min |
/api/v1/payments/* |
Payment Service | Required | 100/min |
/api/v1/shipping/* |
Shipping Service | Required | 300/min |
/admin/api/* |
All Services | Admin Role | 10000/min |
Consequences
Positive:
- Single entry point simplifies client configuration and reduces coupling
- Centralized cross-cutting concerns reduce code duplication across services
- Consistent security policies and rate limiting across all APIs
- Simplified CORS configuration and SSL termination
- Better observability with centralized logging and metrics
- API versioning and backward compatibility support
- Circuit breaker pattern prevents cascading failures
Negative:
- API Gateway becomes a potential single point of failure
- Additional network hop introduces latency
- Gateway configuration complexity increases with service growth
- Potential bottleneck for high-traffic scenarios
- Requires expertise in gateway technology and configuration
- Debugging distributed requests becomes more complex
Neutral:
- Kong requires operational expertise and monitoring
- Gateway configuration needs to be version controlled and tested
- Service discovery integration required for dynamic routing
- Load balancer health checks need configuration
- Backup and disaster recovery planning for gateway instances
Implementation Plan
Phase 1: Basic Gateway Setup
- Deploy Kong in high-availability configuration
- Configure basic routing for User and Catalog services
- Implement JWT authentication plugin
- Set up basic rate limiting
Phase 2: Security & Monitoring
- Configure rate limiting per service and user type
- Implement comprehensive logging and metrics
- Set up circuit breaker patterns
- Configure CORS policies
Phase 3: Advanced Features
- Add request/response transformation plugins
- Implement API versioning support
- Configure service discovery integration
- Set up automated failover and health checking
Phase 4: Migration & Optimization
- Migrate all services behind the gateway
- Optimize performance and caching strategies
- Implement advanced security features
- Set up comprehensive monitoring and alerting
This ADR establishes our API Gateway as the unified entry point for all client-service communication in our microservices architecture.